The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. The petitioners filed the current petition after the death of their original counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-19587 of 2014 Date of Decision: October 06, 2014
Surinder Sharma alias Sahil and Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Punjab & Anr.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Bikram Chaurdhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Bimal Chandan Bitta, Advocate, who had filed the present petition has since died, therefore, the petitioners have engaged him (Bikram Chaudhary) to argue the matter. He further submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition with permission to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
October 06, 2014 seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
Surinder Sharma alias Sahil and Anr.
The State of Punjab & Anr.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
