Dismissed

Tejbir Singh Ahlwat v. P.K. Gupta IAS and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Oct 2014CRM-M/14457/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed and took on record affidavits filed by two respondents of the Haryana State Pollution Control Board in two criminal miscellaneous applications. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Criminal miscellaneous applications allowed for taking affidavits on record; main petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.

Tejbir Singh Ahlwat Vs P.K. Gupta IAS and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

CRM-M-14457-2013 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-14457-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 6, 2014

Tejbir Ahlawat

...Petitioner

Versus

P.K. Gupta and another

¶9

...Respondent s

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

¶11

Present: Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Arun Walia, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Servedaman Rathore, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶13

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral)

¶14

CRM-50752-2013:

¶15

Prayer in this criminal miscellaneous application is for placing on record reply on behalf of respondent No. 1-Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Panchkula, by way of affidavit of its former Chairman.

¶16

Copy of the reply has already been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶17

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the contents of the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the present application is allowed and the reply by of affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent No. 1, is taken on record. CRM-51232-2013:

¶18

Prayer in this criminal miscellaneous application is for placing on record reply on behalf of respondent No. 2-the Regional

¶19

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2014.10.07 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶20

¶21

CRM-M-14457-2013 (O&M)

¶22

Officer, Haryana State Pollution Control Board, Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar, by way of affidavit of the then Regional Officer.

¶23

Copy of the reply has already been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶24

¶25

Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to him under law.

¶26

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶27

Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶28

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) October 6, 2014 JUDGE Pkapoor

¶29

PRASHANT KAPOOR 2014.10.07 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Tejbir Singh Ahlwat v. P.K. Gupta IAS and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tejbir Singh Ahlwat v. P.K. Gupta IAS and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Parkash Vs State of Punjab

Om Parkash & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Harjit Singh Alias Bonny Vs State of Punjab

Gurmeet Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Jasvir Isngh & Anr. Vs Baljinder Singh

Surinder Sharma Alias Sahil and Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.