Criminal Miscellaneous petition in a trial court case fixed for Section 313 Cr.P.C. statement. Petitioner did not press the petition as prosecution had completed evidence. Order disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-32932 of 2014 Date of Decision: October 01, 2014
Om Parkash
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Chaman Lal Pawar, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Varinder Singh, Police Station, Balachaur, S.B.S.Nagar, Punjab, submits that the prosecution has already led its entire evidence and the case before the learned trial court is fixed for today for recording of the statement of the accused under Section 313, Cr.P.C.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 01, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.10.01 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Om Parkash
State of Punjab
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
