The petitioner dropped the writ petition before the discharge of oral arguments. The High Court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9707 of 1994 Date of decision:22.04.2013
Prof.Rajesh Kumar Anand @ Sudarshan Kumar Anand
.....Petitioner
Versus
Guru Nanak Dev University & others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Mr.Aman Bahri, Addl.A.G., Punjab, for respondent No.2.
Mr.Tarun Singla, Advocate, for Mr.A.P.Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
G.S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
press the writ petition.
22.04.2013 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Prof. Rajesh Kumar Anand @ Sudarshan Kumar Anand
Guru Nanak Dev University
others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
