The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel despite proper notice.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7685 of 1995 Date of decision:22.04.2013
Smt.Sarita Rani
.....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Aman Bahri, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
G.S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
In spite of that, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
22.04.2013 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Smt. Sarita Rani
The State of Punjab
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
