This order dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner could not be contacted. Liberty was granted to revive the petition if any substance survives.
Petition dismissed; liberty to move application for revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.9702 of 1992 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 09, 2013
Kashmir Singh Gill
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
Present: Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Verma, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite of sincere efforts having been made to get in touch with the petitioner, he has not been able to contact him. In such circumstances, learned counsel states that the present petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution, however, liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move an application for revival of the writ petition in case something survives therein.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE
July 09, 2013 sukhpreet
2 issues framed by the court
whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to failure to contact the petitioner
whether to grant liberty to revive the writ petition thereafter
Kashmir Singh Gill
State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
JASPAL SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
