Petition for directions to vacate illegally occupied premises was dismissed for want of prosecution; petitioner granted liberty to apply for revival.
no relief granted; liberty granted to file application for revival of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8156 of 1995 (O & M) Date of Decision: July 08, 2013
Ms. Sudarshan Sharma
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Verma, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
In this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution
of India, the petitioner has sought directions to the respondents to vacate the premises i.e. House No.128-L, Model Town, Ludhiana, which is owned by the petitioner and has been illegally occupied by the police.
survives therein.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE
July 08, 2013 sukhpreet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudarshan Sharma
State of Punjab
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
