The petitioner, Sandhu Ram, moved a criminal miscellaneous petition where counsel sought withdrawal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-14995 of 2013 Date of decision: 05.07.2013
Sandhu Ram
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Rajesh Khandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State.
INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the
present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
05.07.2013
mamta
(INDERJIT SINGH) JUDGE
Sandhu Ram
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
