This is a one-line order in a writ petition summarizing detailed reasons in a separate order decided on the same day with identical respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 7059 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision: 06.03.2013
Mrs.Hem Lata
....Petitioner
versus
The Board of Governors and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr.R.K.Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr.Vijay Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.D.D.Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in CWP No.5771 of 2012 titled as “Shobha Rani vs. The Board of Governors and others”.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE 06.03.2013 neenu
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shobha Rani vs. The Board of Governors and othersReferred¶13
CWP No.5771 of 2012
Hem Lata
The Board of Governors and others
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
