Ved Ram Vs State of Haryana etc.

It is the case of the petitioner that vide notification dated 6.5.1996, his 1/3 share in the land measuring 67 kanals 2 marlas, situated in village Unchagaon, Tehsil Ballabgarh, District Faridabad, was acquired for development of Institutional, Residential and Commercial Sector 65, Faridabad. It is the further case of the petitioner that in spite of the requests made by him, the respondents did not consider his claim for allotment of plot under the oustees policy of the State Government. In this regard, a representation dated 14.6.2012, copy of which is available on record as Annexure P-11, was submitted by the petitioner to the Administrator,

¶14

CWP No. 6259 of 2013

¶15

-2-

¶16

Haryana Urban Development Authority, Faridabad (respondent No.3 herein), but till date the same has not been considered and decided.

¶17

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we dispose of this petition with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 14.6.2012 by passing a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months.

¶18

( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE March 22, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE

Ved Ram v. State of Haryana etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ved Ram v. State of Haryana etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhawana/Vimpy Gaba Vs State of Haryana and Others

Laxmi Jain Vs HUDA & Others

Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ramesh Singh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Manik Ghosh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Aganwati Vs State of Haryana etc.