Petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to claim against a subsequent allotment under a respondent's Scheme. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Liberty to make a claim against subsequent allotment under the Scheme.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 6258 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 22.03.2013
Manik Ghosh
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Amit Parashar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make his claim against the subsequent allotment, if any, under the Scheme, as and when floated by the respondents.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
March 22, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Manik Ghosh
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
