Petitioners withdrew the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the matter as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4788 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 26.04.2013
Surinder Pal and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel, on instructions, states that the petitioners do
not want to press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )
JUDGE
April 26, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Surinder Pal and others
State of Haryana and others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
