Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to make representation to the authorities. The court allowed the withdrawal as per the petitioners' prayer.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make representation to the authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 17244 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : 26.04.2013
Narmail Singh and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Batra, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to make representation to the authorities. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 states that he has no objection to the acceptance of this prayer.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 26, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Narmail Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
AMOL RATTAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
