Disposed
M.S. Nagpal and Ors. v. U.T. Administration and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/21183/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 21183 of 2012
DATE OF DECISION : 25.04.2013
M.S. Nagpal and others
.... PETITIONERS
Versus
U.T. Administration and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to first approach the competent authority for regularisation of the violations, and in case, their prayer is declined, it will be open to them to challenge the same in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 25, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
M.S. Nagpal and others
U.T. Administration and others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court