Petition not pressed due to disentitlement on facts recorded by lower court. Writ petition dismissed with no substantive legal principles enunciated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4752 of 2013
DATE OF DECISION : 25.04.2013
Prem Lata Jindal
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. ( Oral )
Learned counsel states that in view of the undisputed fact that the petitioner had purchased the land after the acquisition, on the basis of which she is claiming plot under the oustee quota and which makes her disentitled for such allotment, he does not want to press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
April 25, 2013 ( AMOL RATTAN SINGH ) ndj JUDGE
Prem Lata Jindal
State of Haryana
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
