The court dismissed the filed writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioners, granting liberty to pursue their ordinary civil remedy.
Liberty to avail ordinary civil remedy granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.22293 of 2012 Date of Decision: April 23, 2013
Satish Kumar and others
…Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Batra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, states that petitioners want to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail their ordinary civil remedy.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
April 23, 2013 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) vcgarg JUDGE
Satish Kumar and others
The State of Haryana and others
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
