This order recorded that the impugned matter had become infructuous following the transfer of a 1/8th share of the plot in question in favour of the petitioner by an order dated 22.04.2013. The present petition was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3997 of 2013 Date of Decision: April 23, 2013
Smt. Sudesh Sharma
…Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh and others …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: Mr. G.C. Dhuriwala, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Sonia Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3.
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record copy of order dated 22.04.2013, whereby 1/8th share of the plot in question, has been transferred in favour of the petitioner.
In view of the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner states
that the present petition be dismissed, as having become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(SATISH KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
April 23, 2013 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) vcgarg JUDGE
Smt. Sudesh Sharma
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Satish Kumar Mittal
Amol Rattan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
