Yad Ram & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3446 of 2013 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 08, 2013
Yad Ram and another
....Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to file
a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
May 08, 2013
sukhpreet
Yad Ram
another
The State of Haryana
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court