Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a work allotment and its re-allotment to a new tenderer at a higher rate, retaining liberty to challenge the new allotment.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to challenge new allotment via appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.8158 of 2013 (O & M)
::1::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.8158 of 2013 (O & M) Date of Decision: May 07, 2013
M/s Amar Nath and Company through its Partner Shri Amar Nath
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.J.J.S. Uppal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Singh Sethi, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 8. Mr.K.K. Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Replication to the written statement on behalf of respondents No.1 and 3 has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
CWP No.8158 of 2013 (O & M)
::2::
petitioner to take recourse to the remedies to challenge the alleged allotment so made in pursuance to the tender notice in accordance with
law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
May 07, 2013 sukhpreet
M/s Amar Nath and Company
The State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
