Petitioners withdrew their writ petition to file a Public Interest Litigation instead. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Proceedings dismissed as withdrawn in view of the petitioners' intent to file a PIL.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.25301 of 2013 Date of Decision: November 19, 2013
Deepa Surana and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
Present : Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he wants to file a Public Interest Litigation, hence he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
November 19, 2013 [SURINDER GUPTA]
Mohinder JUDGE
Kumar Mohinder 2013.11.21 11:58 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
Deepa Surana and others
State of Haryana and others
SURYA KANT
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
