A brief order skipping detailed reasons, routinely dismissed for orders recorded in a concurrent judgment titled “Mohan Lal and others Vs. State of Haryana and others” passed by the same bench on the same date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kumar Vinod 2013.07.26 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19054 of 2009 Date of decision:25.07.2013
Krishan
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Paramvir Singh Sikand, Advocate, for respondent no.6.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order
passed in CWP No.9045 of 2009 titled as “Mohan Lal and others Vs.
State of Haryana and others” of even date.
July 25, 2013 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Krishan
State of Haryana
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
