In an interlocutory order, the session judge dismissed a withdrawn Civil Revision Petition without prejudice, allowing the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P. No.1518 of 2013
Date of Decision:25.07.2013
Maam Hussain and another
.....Petitioners
Vs.
Sh. K.B.S. Sidhu and another
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the petition
in order to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
July 25, 2013 ( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) renu JUDGE
Renu 2013.07.27 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Maam Hussain and another
Sh. K.B.S. Sidhu and another
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
