Petitioner filed a writ petition which was subsequently dismissed as infructuous by the Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.14801 of 2013 Date of Decision:15.07.2013
Anju
.....Petitioner
Vs.
Union Territory Chandigarh and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has
become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
July 15, 2013 ( RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) renu JUDGE
Anju
Union Territory Chandigarh
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
