Petitioner filed a writ petition against the rejection of his promotion case. The court found the petition infructuous as the petitioner had already been promoted to the post and continued in service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.14352 of 1995
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14352 of 1995 Date of decision: 12.4.2013
Rakesh Khanna ….Petitioner
Vs.
The Haryana State Cooperartive Supply and Marketing Federation and another ..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. K.G.Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S.Gill, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.K.Dhiman, Advocate for the respondents.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J,(Oral)
CWP No.14352 of 1995
-2-
caste and it has been further stated that he is continuing on the said post.
as such.
12.4.2013 (G.S.SANDHAWALIA) Pka JUDGE
Rakesh Khanna
The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation
Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
