The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging notifications under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by ordering dismissal in identical terms to a recent judgment disposed of on the same date regarding similar issues.
Petition dismissed on the same terms as a similar judgment dated 29.08.2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12945 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 22, 2013
Kanwal Singh and others .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
Present : Mr.N.C.Kinra, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms.Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
CM No.16583 of 2013
Notice to the Advocate General, Haryana.
Ms.Palika Monga, learned Deputy Advocate
General, Haryana, accepts notice.
With the consent of learned counsel for the
parties, the main case is taken on Board for final disposal.
CM stands disposed of.
CWP No.12945 of 2009
The petitioners impugn the notifications dated 15.12.2006 (Annexure P-4) and 14.12.2007 (Annexure P-6) issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, respectively, qua acquisition of their land situated within the revenue estate of Mouza Rohtak.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find that a bunch of writ petitions including CWP No.13001 of
Kumar Mohinder 2013.12.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
CWP No.12945 of 2009 (O&M) [2]
2008 (Narender Kumar and others versus State of Haryana and others pertaining to the acquisition have since been disposed of by this Court vide judgment dated 29.08.2013. Since the issue raised in the instant case is also similar in nature, this writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.
Ordered accordingly.
Dasti.
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
November 22, 2013 [SURINDER GUPTA] Mohinder JUDGE
Kumar Mohinder 2013.12.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the impugned land acquisition notifications dated 15.12.2006 and 14.12.2007.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanwal Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
Surya Kant
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
