This order governs the gazetting of a judgment by referring it to the Reporters of Local papers and reporting it in the Digest, explicitly directing that orders were passed in the associated Writ Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.25509 of 2013 Date of Decision: November 21, 2013
Rajinder Singh and another ……Petitioners Versus
Union of India and others ……Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA.
Present : Mr.Satbir Rathore, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Central Government Standing Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.1. Mr.Rishi Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2. Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl. AG, Punjab, for respondent Nos.3&4.
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP
No.25508 of 2013 (Satpal Singh and others versus Union of
India and others).
(SURYA KANT)
JUDGE
November 21, 2013 (SURINDER GUPTA) Mohinder JUDGE
Kumar Mohinder 2013.11.22 12:07 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh
Rajinder Singh
Union of India
Surya Kant
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
