The Single Judge, pursuant to the order in FAO No. 5223 of 2012, set aside the impugned order dated 18.7.2012 without expressing any views on the merits. The matter was remitted to the Family Court, Faridabad, for fresh adjudication. The case was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No. 3764 of 2012 Date of decision: 22.4.2013
Seema Antil
..... Petitioner
Versus
Kuldeep Antil
..... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
PRESENT: Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
For the reasons mentioned in the order of even date passed in FAO No. 5223 of 2012 (O&M), (Seema Antil Vs. Kuldeep Antil) the impugned order dated 18.7.2012, in the instant case is set aside without expressing any views on merits and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Faridabad, for fresh adjudication.
Disposed of.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE April 22, 2013 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) rishu JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed on 18.7.2012 should be set aside and the matter remitted.
Whether it is necessary to express views on the merits at this stage.
Seema Antil
Kuldeep Antil
Surya Kant
R.P. Nagrath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
