Petitioner withdrew the petition at the outset. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-7878 of 2013 Date of Decision:06.05.2013
Santokh Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.
Present: Mr.J.S.Jaidka, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Raj Preet Singh Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State.
Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate, for the complainant.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends
to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
May 06, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) seema JUDGE
Santokh Singh
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
