Petitioners furnished bail bonds in compliance with an earlier order dated 01.02.2013. The High Court made that order absolute and disposed of the application.
The order dated 01.02.2013 was made absolute as the petitioners furnished the required bail bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-M No. 2925 of 2013. [O&M] Date of Decision: 01st March, 2013.
Manju Aggarwal & Anr.
Petitioner through Mr. Arvind Arora, Advocate, for `Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate
Versus
State of Haryana Respondent through Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
It is stated that in compliance to the order dated
01.02.2013, the petitioners have furnished requisite bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
That being so, the order dated 01.02.2013 is made
absolute.
Disposed of. Dasti .
March 01, 2013. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Manju Aggarwal & Anr.
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
