Single-line order dismissing the petition as infructuous because the company was already ordered to be dissolved in a separate CO court order of the same date. No reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CP No. 31 of 2010. [O&M] Date of Decision: 13th February, 2013.
Tranz Infotech Limited
Petitioner through Mr. Praveen Gupta, Advocate for OL
Versus
Smt. Kamla Devi & Ors. Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT, J. [ORAL]
In view of the fact that the Company has been ordered to
be dissolved vide my separate order of even date passed in CA No.
424_of 2011, this petition is rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Dasti .
February 13, 2013. ( SURYA KANT ) dinesh JUDGE
Tranz Infotech Limited
Smt. Kamla Devi & Ors.
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
