Rahul Soi v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHHIGH COURT…
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHHIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14180-2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.03.2013
Rahul Soi
VS.
State of Haryana & Ors.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Present: Mr. Sanjay Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for respondent No.7 Mr. PR Yadav, Advocate for respondents No.2, 8 & 9
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
(1). It is stated by learned State counsel that on completion of the investigation, challan has been presented and the case is now fixed before the trial court for 25.03.2013 for charges.
(2). In this view of the matter and also keeping in view the fact that the rights of the minor child have been sufficiently protected through various directions issued by this Court from time to time and it may not be now expedient to express any views on merit which may cause unnecessary prejudice to either of the parties, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a specific direction that all the interim orders and directions issued by this Court are made absolute
and shall be treated as part of the final order.
(3). Disposed of.
15.03.2013 (S u r y a K a n t) vishal shonkar Judge
Rahul Soi
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court