The court disposed of the matter by directing users to refer to the order passed in Crl.M.No.M-39858 of 2012 of even date, providing no substantive reasoning or legal proposition in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-264 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: March 13, 2013
Joginder
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Mahavir Singh, Advocate, Ms.Panchajanya Batra Singh, Advocate and Mr.Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Raja Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr.Aman Pal, Advocate for the complainant.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For orders see order passed in Crl.M.No.M-39858 of 2012 of
even date.
13.3.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
Joginder
State of Haryana
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
