In Criminal Misc. No. M-25009 of 2013, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a Section 22 NDPS case. Counsel for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition at the hearing stage, which the court allowed.
Dismissal of the bail application as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-25009 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: October 10, 2013
Madan Lal @ Vicky Dhuria
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Manish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.35006 of 2013
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-25009 of 2013
The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.48, dated 21.4.2012, under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Raman District Bathinda.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
10.10.2013
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
Meenu 2013.10.11 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a Section 22 NDPS case under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Whether the withdrawal of the bail application should be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Madan Lal @ Vicky Dhuria
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
