The single-judge oral order noted that the petitioners had recorded statements indicating they no longer require protection as they were on visiting terms with their family and respondent witnesses assured no harassment. The court found no orders necessary and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc No. M-21364 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.10.2013
Vishali and anr.
...Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Daljeet Singh Virk, AAG, Punjab
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instructions from Head Constable
Kulwinder Singh has informed the Court that the petitioners have got recorded their statement to the effect that they do not require any protection and now they are on visiting terms with their family. Statement of respondent Nos. 4 to 7 have also been recorded to the
effect that they will not harass the petitioners.
No further orders are required to be passed in the present
petition.
Disposed of.
23.10.2013
G.Arora
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
Arora Gaurav 2013.10.31 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vishali
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
