The single judge allowed Criminal Misc. No.M-2051 of 2013 by reference to identical orders passed in Criminal Misc. No.M-27022 of 2012 (Pavitar Singh) regarding reporters' access to judgment and reporting in the Digest.
Petition allowed as per orders in Crl. Misc. No.M-27022 of 2012 regarding judgment reporting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M- 2051 of 2013 Date of decision : 25.01.2013
Baldev Singh
......Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr.Vivek K. Thakur,Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate for the State.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK , J.
Vide orders of even date passed in Criminal Misc. No.M-27022
of 2012 titled as Pavitar Singh and ors. v. State of Punjab, this petition is allowed. For detailed reasons, see the orders passed in the aforesaid petition.
January 25, 2013 (VIJENDER SINGH MALIK) dinesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment should be allowed for reporting purposes.
Baldev Singh
State of Punjab
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
