Anil Kumar and Another v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl.…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-18282 of 2013 Date of Decision: Sept. 24,2013
Anil Kumar and another ............................. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others.................. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
Present: Mr. G.S.Gopera, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. D.S.Virk, AAG, Punjab.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No. 4 to 9.
Counsel for the State has informed the Court that the statement of petitioner No.2-Komal has been recorded on 23.9.2013 to the effect that since the past one month petitioner No.1-Anil Kumar has not been residing with her and his whereabouts are not known to her.
In view of the above, no further orders are
required to be passed.
The petition is disposed of.
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
24.9.2013 Kaur Rupinder2013.09.25 10:40Rupi I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Anil Kumar
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court