Petitioner withdrew the instant petition following a Full Bench judgment of this Court, with liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Judge. The petition was dismissed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A-178-MA of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision: April 12, 2013.
Jarnail Singh
Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: Mr. C.S.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep S. Mann, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
In view of Full Bench judgment of this Court dated 18.03.2013 rendered in CRM-A-790-MA of 2010 titled M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. vs. M/s. Atma Tube Products Ltd. and others, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file an appeal before the Sessions Judge.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
April 12, 2013 parveen kumar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Tata Steel Ltd. vs. M/s. Atma Tube Products Ltd. and othersFollowed¶13
CRM-A-790-MA of 2010
Jarnail Singh
State of Haryana
PARAMJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
