Brijpal and Anr. v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-16196 OF 2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16th MAY, 2013
Brij Pal & another
…. Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
…. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Ms. Monisha Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the instant petition for anticipatory bail.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
16th May, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Brij Pal
State of Haryana
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court