The petitioner sought permission to withdraw criminal miscellaneous petition No. M-1170 of 2011. The court granted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-1170 OF 2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th MAY, 2013
Kuldeep Singh @ Kuldeep Ram
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & another
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Sahil Khunger, Advocate for
Mr.Rahul Chhatwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidharth Sarup, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.1.
None for respondent No.2.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Status report, filed today in Court by State counsel, is taken
on record, subject to all just exceptions.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
15th May, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Kuldeep Singh @ Kuldeep Ram
State of Haryana
another
L. N. MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
