Vijender Anjan v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRL. MISC. No.M-103 OF 2010 DATE OF DECISION : 15th MAY, 2013
Vijender Anjan
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & another
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL
Present : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Mikhail Kad, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for respondent No.2-complaint.
L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
After arguing at length, counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all pleas available to him in accordance with law in the trial Court at the time of framing of charge.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
15th May, 2013 (L. N. MITTAL) ‘raj’ JUDGE
Vijender Anjan
State of Punjab
L. N. Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court