The petition for quashing an FIR grounded in matrimonial and cruelty allegations was filed under Section 482 CrPC. The petitioners withdrew the petition, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn by an oral order.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-16108 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 27, 2013.
Avinash Kumar and another
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Haryana and another
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mrs. Rahish Pahwa (Dudeja), Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raja Sharma, A.A.G. Haryana.
Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Pawan Hooda, Advocate.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.163 (Annexure P-1) dated 17.04.2008 under Sections 406, 498-A, 323 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Chandni Bagh, Panipat, District Panipat and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
Learned counsel for the petitioners requests for withdrawal of this petition.`
Dismissed as withdrawn.
May 27, 2013. Sachin M.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing the FIR under Section 482 CrPC could be allowed in light of the petitioner's request for withdrawal?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Avinash Kumar
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
