Petitioners challenged an impugned order. Counsel submitted the petition had become infructuous as petitioners were acquitted by the Trial Court. Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No. M-1424 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.9.2013
Dalbir Kaur and another
......Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Yadav, AAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No. 2.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioners have been acquitted by the Trial Court.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 25, 2013
Gurpreet
Singh Gurpreet 2013.09.25 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Dalbir Kaur and another
State of Punjab and another
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
