The judgment is a mere order directing that parties see another judgment passed on the same day (Ravi Kumar v. State of Haryana). No substantive reasoning or facts are provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 13544 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: May 17, 2013 .
Siku
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Deepak Sabherwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. Maloo Chahal, DAG, Haryana.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
For orders, see Crl.Misc. No.M- 12549 of 2013 (Ravi Kumar v.
State of Haryana) of even date.
May 17, 2013.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
‘om’
Siku
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
