The petitioner sought constitutional relief against the State. The respondents had already formed a Special Investigating Team. Consequently, the learned judge allowed the withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it as withdrawn on May 23, 2013.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-12286 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 23, 2013
Ajit Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present : Ms. G.K. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. R.P.S., Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, for respondents No.1 to3-State.
****
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
The status report filed on behalf of the respondents-State today in the Court, is taken on record, which would reveal that the State has already constituted a Special Investigating Team (SIT) to investigate the present case.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
May 23, 2013 sonika
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
Ajit Singh
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
