Petitioners sought to withdraw the petition with permission to file a fresh one after the matter was compromised; the court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Dismissal of petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.11025 of 2012
Date of decision : 20.5.2013
Baldev Singh and another
...... Petitioners
v.
State of Punjab
...... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI
Present : Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Shruti Goyal, AAG Haryana.
Mr. Krishan Sehajpal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
M.M.S.BEDI, J (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners informs that the matter has been compromised. He seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
20.5.2013 Meenu
( M.M.S.Bedi ) Judge
Baldev Singh and another
State of Punjab
M.M.S.Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
