Disposed
Seema Rani v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11024/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-11024 of 2013 Date of Decision:- 09.09.2013
Seema Rani
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Deswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for the State.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the instant petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition, after impleading the affected persons/accused as respondent(s).
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed
for.
September 09, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE
Kumar Naresh 2013.09.12 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Seema Rani
State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court