Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition as the trial was near conclusion. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-15174 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 06.09.2013
Shakti Arora
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the State.
MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral)
At the very outset, learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Paramjit Singh Nijjar, has submitted that the trial has almost been concluded and only one S.I. remains to be examined in this case.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner
intends to withdraw the present petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
September 06, 2013 ( M EHINDER S INGH S ULLAR) naresh.k JUDGE
Kumar Naresh 2013.09.12 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Shakti Arora
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
