A briefer judgment passed on July 12, 2013, referring to a connected order passed in Crl. Appeal No. 190-DB of 2002. The current judgment on Crl. Appeal No. 328-DB of 2002 is essentially a directive to follow that order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Appeal No. 328-DB of 2002 Date of Decision:- July 12, 2013
Rakesh Kumar
..............APPELLANT(S)
vs.
State of Haryana
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. G.S. Chahal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.
For orders, see judgment of even date passed in Crl. Appeal No.
190-DB of 2002, Sunil Kumar and another vs. State of Haryana.
(G.S. Sandhawalia) Judge 12.07.2013 (Jasbir Singh) shivani Judge
Gupta Shivani 2013.08.02 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunil Kumar and another vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶13
Sunil Kumar and another vs. State of Haryana (Crl. App. No. 190-DB of 2002)
Rakesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Jasbir Singh
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
