Amarjit Singh v. Harmeet Kaur
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.R.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Manoj Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 2013.12.12 10:24I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document AT CHANDIGARH High Court Chandigarh
C.R. No.7594 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of decision: 10.12.2013
Amarjit Singh
.............Petitioner
v.
Harmeet Kaur
.............Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent.
Jaswant Singh,J(Oral).
Husband is in revision aggrieved against the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge (Fast Track Court), Jalandhar whereby maintenance pendente lite in the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the wife was fixed at the rate of Rs.4000/- per month.
It was claimed that the assessment was on the higher side.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition has become infructuous in view of the parties having amicably settled their matrimonial dispute in the mediation proceedings on 14.5.2013 before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner at Bar, present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
December 10, 2013 ( JASWANT SINGH ) manoj JUDGE
Amarjit Singh
Harmeet Kaur
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court