Disposed

M/S Bandhu Aero Space Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Parti

Punjab & Haryana HC11 Oct 2013CR/6029/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner-firm filed a revision under the Haryana Urban Rent Act against eviction order on grounds of landlord's personal necessity. During hearing, petitioner withdrew the revision but sought 1.5 years' time to find alternative accommodation. Court allowed extension subject to terms.

What did the court decide?

Granted one and half years' time from 1.11.2013 to shift, subject to payment of arrears, future rent of Rs.50,000 per month in advance, and surrender of vacant possession before 30.04.2015.

M/S Bandhu Aero Space Pvt. Ltd. Vs Geeta Parti — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2013)

¶1

Manoj Kumar #1# 2013.10.11 16:05I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶2

C.R. No.6029 of 2013 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

¶4

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

C.R. No.6029 of 2013 (O&M)

¶6

Date of Decision: 11.10.2013

¶7

M/s Bandhu Aero Space Pvt Ltd

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Smt. Geeta Parti

....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

¶13

Present: Mr. V.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Kadian, Advocate along with Mr. Amit ChopraAuthorized Signatory.

¶14

Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the respondent-caveator.

¶15

JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL)

¶16

The petitioner-firm through its Authorized Signatory (tenant) is in revision under Section 15(6) of the Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act,1973 (for short “the Act”) against the order dated 5.5.2012 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Gurgaon and the order dated 10.9.2013 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Gurgaon affirming the findings whereby the petitioner-firm has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord.

¶17

After arguing for sometime and realising that the Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from Mr. Anil Chopra, the Authorized Signatory, who is present in Court, submits that he would not press this petition but in view of the nature of the business and also the fact that the petitioner has been tenant with the demised premises since 1988, he

¶18

C.R. No.6029 of 2013 (O&M)

¶19

#2#

¶20

prays for one and half years' time to make alternative arrangement.

¶21

Learned counsel for the caveator/respondent/landlord has graciously agreed to the grant of one and half years' time subject to the tenant paying the future rent @ Rs.50000/- per month w.e.f. 1.11.2013 besides clearing the arrears of rent at the pre-determined rate till 31.10.2013, if any.

¶22

In view of the agreed stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the present revision petition is disposed of as not pressed, however one and half years' time commencing from 1.11.2013 is granted to the petitioner/tenant for making alternative arrangement to shift from the demised premises subject to their furnishing an undertaking on or before 15.11.2013 before the learned Rent Controller, Gurgaon that they shall hand over actual, physical, vacant and peaceful possession of the demised premises to the respondent/landlord on or before 30.4.2015. The petitioner shall also clear arrears of rent, if any, at the pre determined rate of rent before 15.11.2013 and the said fact shall also be mentioned in the undertaking that the petitioner has cleared arrears of rent,if any. Further the petitioner shall pay future rent @ Rs.50,000/- per month in advance by 7^th of every month for the one and half years' time granted to him commencing from 1.11.2013.

¶23

Needless to say that any violation of the aforesaid terms shall entitle the landlord to seek petitioner's eviction forthwith with police help, if necessary, without recourse to any other remedy besides the petitioner/tenant making himself liable to be hauled up in contempt proceedings.

¶24

( JASWANT SINGH ) JUDGE

¶25

October 11, 2013 manoj

M/S Bandhu Aero Space Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Parti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bandhu Aero Space Pvt. Ltd. v. Geeta Parti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

(O&M) G. Rajinder Singh Vs Sukhwinder Singh

Victor Vs Rupinder Kaur Brar

Gopal Thapar Vs Hazara Singh

Sandeep Gaur Vs Renu Bala and Ors.

Simranpreet Singh Gill Vs Jaswant Singh and Ors.

Mahesh Vs Sher Singh & Ors.